For now everything should be more or less separate. Tobago is an incubator project so its not going to be part of myfaces for some time. I'm not sure if they are planning to use the "share" subproject but they should definitely have their own jar, TLD and faces-config.xml (same as my position on the sandbox.)
sean On 9/26/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > Since the Tobago guys have sent their CLA paperworks to the ASF, > > we now have to decide how that thing will really work :-) > > > > We discussed in an older thread that they are olny committing into the > > "tobago" source code base and not into myfaces (api|core|tomahawk) > > (remember the "gentlement's agreement" mail :-)) > > > > So we have figure out how that will work... > > > > So should we create a new subproject in SVN for "tobago"? Sean brought > > this up in another thread. > > > > Perhaps a subproject makes most sense... Because we will have than > > "families" of components: > > -tomahawk > > -tobago > > -sandbox > > > +1 for separate taglibs (finally I am allowed to vote ;-) ), the main reason > for this is, that > the tobago components overal to a certain degree functionality wise > yet they cannot be mixed with tomahawk for now. > Also we might get other component libs in the long run under the myfaces > umbrella... > Id say that a different taglib compatible to the myfaces core > is a good idea. > >
