+1 for separate subproject just like tomahawk
regards, Martin On 9/26/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For now everything should be more or less separate. Tobago is an > incubator project so its not going to be part of myfaces for some > time. I'm not sure if they are planning to use the "share" subproject > but they should definitely have their own jar, TLD and > faces-config.xml (same as my position on the sandbox.) > > sean > > On 9/26/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > > > Since the Tobago guys have sent their CLA paperworks to the ASF, > > > we now have to decide how that thing will really work :-) > > > > > > We discussed in an older thread that they are olny committing into the > > > "tobago" source code base and not into myfaces (api|core|tomahawk) > > > (remember the "gentlement's agreement" mail :-)) > > > > > > So we have figure out how that will work... > > > > > > So should we create a new subproject in SVN for "tobago"? Sean brought > > > this up in another thread. > > > > > > Perhaps a subproject makes most sense... Because we will have than > > > "families" of components: > > > -tomahawk > > > -tobago > > > -sandbox > > > > > +1 for separate taglibs (finally I am allowed to vote ;-) ), the main > > reason for this is, that > > the tobago components overal to a certain degree functionality wise > > yet they cannot be mixed with tomahawk for now. > > Also we might get other component libs in the long run under the myfaces > > umbrella... > > Id say that a different taglib compatible to the myfaces core > > is a good idea. > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Trainings in English and German
