+1 for separate subproject
On 9/26/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
for separate subproject just like tomahawk
regards,
Martin
On 9/26/05, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For now everything should be more or less separate. Tobago is an
> incubator project so its not going to be part of myfaces for some
> time. I'm not sure if they are planning to use the "share" subproject
> but they should definitely have their own jar, TLD and
> faces-config.xml (same as my position on the sandbox.)
>
> sean
>
> On 9/26/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > Hi all.
> > >
> > > Since the Tobago guys have sent their CLA paperworks to the ASF,
> > > we now have to decide how that thing will really work :-)
> > >
> > > We discussed in an older thread that they are olny committing into the
> > > "tobago" source code base and not into myfaces (api|core|tomahawk)
> > > (remember the "gentlement's agreement" mail :-))
> > >
> > > So we have figure out how that will work...
> > >
> > > So should we create a new subproject in SVN for "tobago"? Sean brought
> > > this up in another thread.
> > >
> > > Perhaps a subproject makes most sense... Because we will have than
> > > "families" of components:
> > > -tomahawk
> > > -tobago
> > > -sandbox
> > >
> > +1 for separate taglibs (finally I am allowed to vote ;-) ), the main reason for this is, that
> > the tobago components overal to a certain degree functionality wise
> > yet they cannot be mixed with tomahawk for now.
> > Also we might get other component libs in the long run under the myfaces
> > umbrella...
> > Id say that a different taglib compatible to the myfaces core
> > is a good idea.
> >
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Trainings in English and German
