> That approach makes sense if you decide not to include the sandbox
> components. But, my basic advice still stands ... if you ever *do* combine
> two component tag libraries into a single JAR file, go ahead and merge the
> faces-config.xml entries, but *don't* combine the TLDs. That only creates
> maintenance problems for users.
The plan is to move the components from one library to another as they
are promoted out of the sandbox. (Not quite merging them together but
close enough.) Are you saying that we should leave the TLD alone? I
guess we could have a copy of the sandbox TLD in tomahawk.jar so the
old TLD references would still work...
If you *move* a component, that's an argument for making the developer change prefixes (although keeping the old one around for backwards compatibility, at least for a while, would be nice). I got the impression, from the original message I responded to, that you were planning to make the user change their URIs and prefixes depending on which packaging of JARs they decided to use for the same components (separate JARs for each or a "all" JAR including multiple libraries). That would be bad.
> Craig
sean
Craig
