IMO it´s better if we fix a bug in both trunk and the branch. Trunk is used by more users (either by svn or through the nightlies). This will give us more feedback if a bugfix introduces a new bug.
2005/9/28, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Bugs that have been introduced on the branch (ex. MYFACES-634) should > obviously be fixed on the branch. > > Additional Rule of thumb: If the bug is going to be fixed in the > branch fix it *only* in the branch. Do not fix in the trunk. We will > merge into the trunk in a few weeks when we are done. > > sean > > On 9/27/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I changed all of the issues fixed in nightly to be version 1.1.1 (by > > renaming the existing nightly version in JIRA and creating a new one.) > > > > So we can now search on a list of things that are fixed in that > > version and eventually generate release notes. > > > > Thanks Bill for the branch (its tedious - I know.) > > > > sean > > > > On 9/27/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > branch created > > > > > > If you want a bug to be fixed in the 1_1_1 release you must apply > > > your changes to the release/branches/1_1_1 branch in SVN. > > > > > > Please limit the changes to the ones identified in the other thread > > > titled '[proposal] Branch Content'. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -bd- > > > > > > On Sep 27, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > > > Go for it. > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > On 9/27/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Sean, > > > >> > > > >> I need about 30 more minutes to finish up something. I'll start the > > > >> branch around 1:00 EST. Is that OK with everyone? > > > >> > > > >> TTFN, > > > >> > > > >> -bd- > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Mathias
