Good news! @Werner: this is perfectly alright. If the contribution is more than a few lines of code, you will need to get the contributors to file a CLA.
regards, Martin On 10/10/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Btw. just a minor question, how is the issue generally handled, > the reason why I am asking is, that I have some code > which I would love to integrate, in both cases I have > the written permission by the author to relicense the stuff > in Apache2 license. > In one case I have a mail, in the other one > the perm in the authors blog. > > Werner > > > Sylvain Vieujot wrote: > > Here is the answer from the Kupu guys. > > So, there should be no problem : > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > *From*: Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > *Reply-To*: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > *To*: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > *Subject*: [kupu-dev] Re: Licence problem > > *Date*: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:40:38 +0000 (UTC) > > > > Sylvain Vieujot wrote: > > > >> We have integrated Kupu in Apache MyFaces, and we just discovered that > >> Sarissa is GPL. > >> This means that we can't include Kupu as is in an Apache project. > >> > >> Do you guys have a solution for this ? > >> > > > > Read the README.txt file: > > > >> The Sarissa ECMAScript library shipped in this distribution > >> (common/sarissa.js) is the work of Manos Batis and distributed under > >> the Kupu License with his kind permission. > > > > *So although the original Sarissa.js allows you the choice between GPL and * > > *LGPL, the copy we use is actually subject to the Kupu licence.* > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > kupu-dev mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/kupu-dev > > > > > > On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 10:50 +0200, Werner Punz wrote: > > > >>Sylvain Vieujot wrote: > >> > >>> Downloading Sarissa it at build would be fine, for those that build from > >>> source. > >>> But wouldn't it prevent us from distributing the compiled version ? > >>> > >>Why not reuse jsf-comp as a sideproject for critical stuff, which can be > >>downloaded and plugged into a running application? > >> > >>Sort of as an tomahawk2 thing. > >> > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Trainings in English and German
