I think that basically we all know that your approach would be the best, John. It is just a matter of getting it to work automatically.
Is there any chance to do so? regards, Martin On 11/2/05, John Fallows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/2/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Agreed. However, the reason is out of date because the projects are > now > > > separated (as they should be). > > > > Separating the projects makes it easier for someone to use Tomahawk > > stuff with the RI. So that is a major plus. > > I'm glad we agree on this point. :-) > > It is a direct benefit of: > > The implementation of the standard runtime stands alone. > The implementation of any extensions to the standard also stand alone. > > MyFaces Runtime version X and MyFaces Runtime version Y are both valid > implementations of the standard runtime and should work with an > implementation of any extension to the standard, including MyFaces Tomahawk > version Z. > > At present, this is not guaranteed by the shared code strategy. That > problem should be resolved. > > Kind Regards, > John Fallows. > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Trainings in English and German
