http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-escapes.html
for some of them. I'd like to see both options available.
On 11/8/05, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, I think the issue is rather lame. The reporter is, for
some reason, storing characters as numerical character
references. If the characters were stored as plain Unicode
(or unescaped back into plain Unicode) as they should be,
then there'd be no issues. In other words, the user can solve
his own problem without any API changes.
The only really legit use case for escape="false" on a selectItem
is for something like selectManyCheckbox, if you wanted to
have HTML formatting in the label.
Cheers,
Adam Winer
On 11/8/05, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, sandbox it is then :)
>
>
> On 11/8/05, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would say that they are new components and that they should go in
> > the sandbox first. If they are really that simple we could vote them
> > out once every one has a chance to see them (perhaps with a few other
> > components that might be ready - scheduler jumps to mind.)
> >
> > IMO putting stuff in the sandbox allows the person who wants to go
> > forward with an idea to do so without forcing everyone else to decide
> > on the merits of the idea without seeing it in action. Its also a
> > quality control check on examples, javadoc, etc.
> >
> > On the other hand, I was thinking of adding a tag to an existing
> > converter. That probably goes straight into tomahawk because the
> > component is there already. Ultimately its a fuzzy line ...
> >
> > My .02
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 11/8/05, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In response to:
> > >
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-407
> > >
> > > I would like to suggest adding two new extended components to be able to
> > > handle the escape attribute at the item level for the select*
> components. I
> > > have begun implementing this functionality to the parent tomahawk
> > > components.
> > > Does this require a vote ? Do they have to go through the sandbox first
> > > (I'm hoping not, as they're not really "new" components) ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Grant Smith
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
--
Grant Smith
