Thomas,
I think my problem is that I am still using 1.1.1 RC3. In this version the constructor is empty. Thanks for your help.
Ryan
On 11/9/05, Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This does not seem to be the problem. The renderer type for
org.apache.myfaces.component.html.ext.HtmlDataTable
is set to "org.apache.myfaces.Table" in HtmlDataTable's constructor
(DEFAULT_RENDERER_TYPE = "org.apache.myfaces.Table").
Can you explore the problem again?
.
On 11/9/05, Ryan Wynn < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using shale clay with myfaces. So like facelets, I am not using jsp
> but rather html/xml templates.
>
> I noticed that the myfaces extended HtmlDataTable component was defaulting
> to the renderer type javax.faces.Table (inherited) instead of the correct
> type org.apache.myfaces.Table.
>
> I looked at the jsp tag and found out that org.apache.myfaces.Table is being
> set on the component there. So to patch it I just set the rendererType
> explicitly in the clay config. But it seems to me that the component should
> default to an appropriate renderer, instead of relying on the tag to do it.
>
> Any thoughts? I will submit a bug to JIRA if the group agrees. From what I
> have seen most components declare a constant String DEFAULT_RENDERER_TYPE.
>
>
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
