Sounds promising to me! Even though from the perfomance tests that have been posted to the mailing list a while ago, it doesn't look like going through the lifecycle is the big problem - but rather restoring/saving the state if you use client-side state saving.
Adam, can you confirm that from your experience with ADF Faces? regards, Martin On 11/15/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. That confirms what I suspected (as far as being able to have > a custom lifecycle using an init param.) > > So the suggestion would be in MyFaces to create a new custom lifecycle > that included the default lifecycle and other optional steps. With > the right URL or request parameter you would use the nonstandard > phases (or jump around in a non-standard way). Otherwise you would > follow the standard steps only. By default (without the special > servlet context init parameter) you would get the default lifecycle. > Would this work? > > sean > > On 11/15/05, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can configure FacesServlet to have a custom lifecycle using > > a servlet context init parameter. But you can't, say, have two > > FacesServlets each running a different lifecycle - one standard, > > one trimmed for AJAX-ing. That's what JSF 1.2 adds, because > > you can configure the lifecycle ID as a servlet config > > parameter, not just a context init parameter. > > > > -- Adam > > > > On 11/15/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think Craig was referring to the *current* ability to configure a > > > custom lifecycle. From the javadocs it looks like this is supported. > > > Can you clarify this some? > > > > > > sean > > > > > > On 11/15/05, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 11/15/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > For the type (a) components (where you need the component tree and > > > > > model), Craig offered an interesting solution. He was toying with the > > > > > idea of a custom lifecylce. I hadn't even realized this was possible > > > > > but it sounds interesting. > > > > > > > > > > I posted something on struts-dev asking him for more details. Not > > > > > sure if it belongs in MyFaces or Shale but it could be worthwhile. > > > > > Perhaps we could modify FacesServlet so that the default lifecycle > > > > > still applies but that you can also configure it with a specialized > > > > > lifecycle. > > > > > > > > JSF 1.2 offers support for configuring multiple instances > > > > of the FacesServlet with different lifecycles. Jacob's idea, > > > > IIRC. (Craig hasn't been especially involved in the JSF > > > > EG for quite awhile now.) > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
