If you can add javadocs that are reverse engineered, and are even more detailed than the exisiting 1.1 stuff, then great!
On 11/22/05, Simon Kitching <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruno Aranda wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I've talked with Ed Burns in the ##jsf irc channel and he has got a
> final answer on the question whether or not we can use the RI
> javadocs. He has said that we CAN'T use the JSF 1.1 Javadocs because
> it is not under the CDDL, but we CAN use the javadocs for JSF 1.2,
That's good news.
So the question is now: what should be done for the current release?
(a)
Write javadoc for the MyFaces API classes by copying from the JSF1.2
javadoc and trimming out the bits that aren't relevant to 1.1
(b)
Go with javadoc reverse-engineered for the code for the current MyFaces
releases, and merge in the JSF1.2 javadoc when MyFaces branches for 1.2
support?
By the way, I've also asked on legal-discuss@apache.org about writing
javadoc based on the code, and the opinions so far are that there is no
problem with that. I'd therefore like to commit some docs as soon as
there is a decision on A vs B above (written using approach B of course).
Cheers,
Simon
--
Grant Smith
