Yes, closing them immediately is what is was decided some time ago. Thus, we ease the burden of closing all the JIRA issues later...
Regards, Bruno 2005/11/24, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 for closing immediately. > > We can always reopen later ;). > > The last time I closed Thomas bugs, I'll talk to him to use close > instead of resolve as well. > > regards, > > Martin > > On 11/23/05, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, the other projects I've been on that use JIRA mark bugs "closed" > > after a public release is made. I did a quick search and only Thomas > > was marking things resolved but not closed, so I went ahead and closed > > it. Since the second report was submitted as an improvment, WON'T > > FIX is probably good enough, but I did strongly consider INVALID :) > > > > Thanks for commenting. > > > > On 11/23/05, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Mike, > > > > > > Mike Kienenberger wrote: > > > > Should I be closing invalid or won't fix jira issues at the same time > > > > I resolve them? > > > > > > > > > > I would personally have marked this particular issue "invalid" rather > > > than "wontfix". > > > > > > invalid: the report is not a bug. > > > wontfix: it's agreed that it is a bug or "misfeature" but there is no > > > intention of making any change. > > > > > > > > > And as MyFaces doesn't have a QA dept to double-check resolved issues > > > and mark them fixed, I think it's better to use "closed" immediately > > > rather than "resolved". > > > > > > But that's just my opinion. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Simon > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >
