I removed it as soon as I realized there was still a lack of clarity on this issue. However, (and I'm not a lawyer), the CDDL looks compatible with the Apache license to me.
On 12/2/05, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A while back someone asked if ASF was reviewing CDDL to allow including > part of glassfish into a future MyFaces JSF1.2 implementation. Did a > review ever happen? > > My understanding is JSF1.2 (and the rest of glassfish) is CDDL licensed, > and that CDDL is _NOT_ compatible with the Apache license. Someone from > Apache legal needs to review this issue, and in the meantime we need to > remove anything that comes from the JEE5 RI. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:14 PM > > To: MyFaces Development > > Subject: Re: svn commit: r350265 - > /myfaces/api/trunk/src/java/javax/faces/component/UIComponent.java > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Author: mkienenb > > > Date: Thu Dec 1 07:59:09 2005 > > > New Revision: 350265 > > > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=350265&view=rev > > > Log: > > > Copied JSF RI 1.2 javadoc for setParent(UIComponent) > > > > Do we really have the "all clear" to copy JSF1.2 javadoc to MyFaces? > > I know that one of the MyFaces developers stated that he had chatted > > with Ed Burns (JSF1.2 spec lead) on IRC and had been told that the > > license for JSF1.2 allowed this. But that's kind of informal. > > > > Has anyone actually read the license that the JSF1.2 javadoc is under, > > and confirmed that it is acceptable to copy this into MyFaces 1.1.x? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Simon > >
