Hi,
Is it really ok for stuff in the "api" and "impl" subdirs to depend on
commons-logging?
Does the spec say anything about dependency requirements for the JSF
implementation? In particular, I'm concerned that j2ee.jar will
apparently require a JSF implementation to be included in the future; if
MyFaces is that implementation and it uses org.apache.* libs then those
libs must also be bundled in the j2ee.jar file, or be bundled by every
container that provides that j2ee file. And exposing libraries via the
container like that can cause pain, as we all found out when a buggy
version of org.apache.xerces was bundled with java 1.4 :-(
I see that currently 3 classes in the "api" project use JCL, and lots of
classes in "impl".
JBoss and Tomcat always provide JCL jars at the container level (which
is a bad idea IMHO, but that's another topic). However not all
containers may.
Cheers,
Simon
Martin Marinschek wrote:
yes.
You can do whatever you want, as long as it is private ;)
regards,
Martin
On 12/7/05, Travis Reeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it safe to put loggers into Spec components, for instance in
UISelectMany, to show why something is invalid?
Travis
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
