Sean
I offered and posted some prelimenary M2 scripts a while back. Wendy
gave some feedback but there didn't seem to be much interest from others
:-( Apart from that I also give sidetracked.
M2 is pretty cool but a number of plugins seem to be incomplete. I've
now got both a version M1.0.2 & M2 working as multiprojects. I've been
working with Maven for a while, but am no expert! However if there's
interest in the scripts I will work on them. The layout you proposed is
basically what I already have...
BTW very interesting to see the reports provided by Maven.
PMD seems to be OK, Checkstyle against Sun specs gives thousands of
errors and I've seen heaps of copy paste stuff. Some work there on the
quality front :-)
Colin
Schofield wrote:
OK lets agree to drop core then since most don't like it ;-)
I think we have enough +1's for myfaces-commons.jar. If anyone wants
to express a -1 for this please do so in the next few days. For now
we'll assume this new jar in the maven builds.
I have some preliminary work done on the m2 scripts. I wrote my own
since nobody came forward with their efforts. I'm borrowing ideas
from the tobago and struts scripts. I have to say that I'm pretty
impressed with m2 so far. There is more to learn but its quite nice.
Within the next few days I hope to have something on the *test* SVN
server for us to experiment with. That way everyone can start
contributing patches and test and we can all be on the same page.
I've been thinking about Manfred's idea of commons-jsf. There might
be some merit to that idea but I still think we should wait. Lets
tackle reorg, maven and a 1.1.2 release first.
As for breaking up tomahawk, again I think there is some value to this
proposal but I think we're better off putting out a 1.1.2 release with
Maven (and reworking the website) first. That will take enough time
and energy. Then I think we can turn our attention to how we
integrate tobago and move it out of the incubator.
sean
On 11/30/05, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/30/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we split the components, we will need another prefix for
myfaces-core ('ft', 'f' from the standard core and 't' from tomahawk)?
I see many decisions in this thread now :-) So I also think that we
should avoid the name myfaces-core.
I'd suggest "tf" and "th" to parallel "f" and "h"
It's gonna be ugly no matter how we go, though :)
