some clazzes (EditableValueHolder) still contain some... javadoc. I am +1 on removing this. Only
<snip> * see Javadoc of <a href="http://java.sun.com/j2ee/javaserverfaces/1.1_01/docs/api/index.html">JSF Specification</a> * </snip> should be used. ok? On 12/20/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > regards, > > Martin > > On 12/20/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I saw Simons legal question and Geir recommended to link back to sun, > > since rolling our own JavaDoc for spec related stuff is not that best > > way. > > > > We already to on our page (http://myfaces.apache.org/javadoc.html). > > Also inside of some clazzes (not at all) > > > > <snip> > > /** > > * see Javadoc of JSF Specification > > * > > * @author Manfred Geiler (latest modification by $Author: mwessendorf $) > > * @version $Revision: 166994 $ $Date: 2004-07-02 00:12:40 +0200 (Fri, > > 02 Jul 2004) $ > > */ > > public class UINamingContainer > > > > </snip> > > > > However, what do you think... should we use instead of "see Javadoc of > > JSF Specification" the hyperlink to the *original* javadocs? > > > > -Matthias > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- Matthias Wessendorf Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 50674 Köln http://www.wessendorf.net mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
