I just reviewed the code of jsf-api again - and what someone - was it you, Manfred? did before was calling
facesContext.getExternalContext().log(); Now is this what we actually want to do? regards, Martin On 12/23/05, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/23/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry for stepping into this discussion so late. > > > > -0.5 on having a "hard" dependency of jsf-api to an external logging api > > At least Craigs issue must be assured: developers should be able to > > compile their custom components against jsf-api without having the > > need for extra libs (commons-logging). Is this guaranteed if we only > > use commons-logging within methods and there is no public/protected > > API dependency in jsf-api? > > Yes, this is guaranteed. > > -- Adam > > > > If yes, I'm -0 on that. > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
