Never mind. I saw your +1 on the other thread.
On 1/5/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Definitely. We basically decided that a long time ago. We just > haven't done a release like this yet (but that will change.) > > So do you like the revised proposal (as far as layout goes?) > > Sean > > On 1/5/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/5/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > True. The one issue to be aware of is when commons changes. If > > > containers ship with an older version of MyFaces (including the > > > commons jar) there could be conflicts. No big deal though. We just > > > make sure to remind people to upgrade commons if they are downloading > > > the "tomahawk only" release. (We should probably include the > > > commons.jar in the tomahawk release as well.) > > > > Another "sooner rather than later" task we should complete is to make > > the build process package commons separately for impl and for > > tomahawk. Then we don't have to worry about conflicts. > > > > We don't want to force a new release of impl just because we've added > > extra functionality to commons. > > >
