John and Adam's, sorry ;) regards,
Martin On 1/7/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, > > don't get me wrong - we don't have to fix this before getting into > incubator, just on the exit. And I'd definitely combine this exit with > a major release, and on a major release you should be able to change > package names, and your users will accept that. > > But it's John and Jonas call on how and when they want to handle this. > > regards, > > Martin > > On 1/7/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > What we can do is providing *wrapper* for the package stuff. ADF Faces > > > is software, which is already in use by lot's of people, so... if we > > > change *all* packages, we bother some users IMO. So we can set the > > > *old* as deprecated and provide *new* org.apache.** package. > > > > > > Not sure if it is ok... starting an incubation with different packages > > > then org.apche.** > > > > > Not hat my meaning has any weight here, but with modern IDEs it should > > easily be possible to do some search and replace on the code. > > Or we can provide a simple ant script to do this. It should be that hard > > to replace using the fqn name of the changed classes. > > > > --- > > Mario > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
