On 1/8/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That (having the website on the zone machine) is not going to be popular with the infra folks, and for good reasons. They'll want the static websites (Maven generated or not) to be on minotaur, and appropriately mirrored to ajax when necessary.
It's perfectly reasonable for the static website to *point* at demos and live running examples on the zones, but the website itself should be where the rest of them are, complete with the mirroring onto ajax for European users.
Craig
Bruno,
I'm moving this discussion to the list. Others may have something to
contribute here ...
I think for now we will publish the site to the zone. At least until
we're ready to switch to the mavenized site. Then we can discuss
whether we want it on minotaur or the zone. Don't worry about the
exact location for now.
That (having the website on the zone machine) is not going to be popular with the infra folks, and for good reasons. They'll want the static websites (Maven generated or not) to be on minotaur, and appropriately mirrored to ajax when necessary.
It's perfectly reasonable for the static website to *point* at demos and live running examples on the zones, but the website itself should be where the rest of them are, complete with the mirroring onto ajax for European users.
Craig
