On 1/10/06, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can we still get reactor type functionality without the pom that is > currently in build?
That's my question as well. -- Wendy
On 1/10/06, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can we still get reactor type functionality without the pom that is > currently in build?
That's my question as well. -- Wendy