> I would prefer directory name == artifactId I agree. myfaces-tomahawk-module is too long. Just tomahawk is fine. There was a discussion about changing it to myfaces-tomahawk (Martin is for this) or keeping it as tomaahwk (Bernd is for this.) I am somewhere in the middle. Lets leave them alone (so just tomahawk) until we have everything working before making a final naming decision.
> myfaces-project is a good idea + 1 > > myfaces/api/myfaces-assembly/pom.xml => child to myfaces/api/pom.xml > > groupId = org.apache.myfaces > > artifactiId = myfaces-assembly I think we should change to core-assembly/pom.xml with artifact id of myfaces-core. Its not the entire myfaces project that is assembled, just the core (api + impl). Also, shouldn't the assembly for core include the commons.jar as a dependency? We want to distribute the commons.jar in the resulting zip file don't we? I think it would be a pain to have to download the *correct* version of commons when a new core release comes out. > I think sandbox is the sandbox for tomahawk What do you mean by this? Yes its true that the sandbox stuff eventually gets promoted to sandbox. I think we originally had something like this over the weekend when you and I were moving things around. What is changing your mind on this? I think its fine the way it is. [snip] > Bernd Sean
