On 1/10/06, Mike Kienenberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dustin, how about adding it to 516?
I'll point out again that I think there's already a working phase
listener for this situation attached to issue 403.
On 1/10/06, Dustin Bruzenak <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> I know this issue has been closed, but I figured I'd attach an actual
> working PhaseListener for those of us who want to move forward temporarily
> with this approach. My example was afflicted with a few bugs that I've now
> tested and fixed. Unfortunately, that issue is closed. Where should I stick
> the update?
>
> Thanks,
> Dustin
>
