On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 22:17 +0100, Manfred Geiler wrote: > 2006/1/12, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > i think matze has already added the license. > > > Maybe a checkstyle report can check this in the future. > > > > +1 for a checkstyle to check for license > > > > > I have one problem > > > the xmlns="http://java.sun.com/JSP/TagLibraryDescriptor"; attribute in > > > the taglib node caused a problem with the tlddoc report. > > > > Bruno and I had the same problem. I was suprised to see it working on > > the website you posted. How did you make it work then? > > > > > Arvid found 2 possible solutions: > > > > > > Remove the > > > PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD JSP Tag Library 1.2//EN" > > > "http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd"; > > > declaration from the myfaces_core.tld, myfaces_html.tld, tomahawk.tld > > > and sandbox.tld in src/main/tld > > > > > > or use a different xsl file for resolving the entities (but no indent). > > > > > > What would you prefer? > > > > Would a different XSL file work? If so that seems to be better don't you > > think? > > > > Yes, I agree with Sean. > > And: The PUBLIC thingy is also required by some web containers AFAIK.
I'm confused. Could someone please explain what this xls/dtd issues is actually about, and what Arvid's suggestions mean (BTW, who is Arvid?). What is the problem that is actually occurring? I would think that removing public declarations is not allowed; that defines the document type. Without a public declaration, an xml document is meaningless - or at least has no "context" to be interpreted in. I see the alternative was something to do with removing indenting from something? Which files are we talking about, and why would indenting have anything to do with it? Cheers, Simon
