On 1/14/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sean Schofield schrieb: > > That's not what I was thinking. I was thinking about your original > > idea of core/trunk/api, core/trunk/impl, core/trunk/core-assembly. > > please name it myfaces-api and myfaces-impl > if you don't like it, you should not use maven I know it is possible to > configure maven to handle it. But if you configure to much in maven you > are going the wrong way and should stay with ant.
Since I'm not having any trouble with the m2 Struts build where the directory names don't match the <artifactId>s, I asked on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113724973700002&r=1&w=2 One person said no problem, another brought up the (unrelated) point that if the parent pom isn't directly above the child, you need to use <relativePath>. There are only two things I've found that Maven does *not* want to do, and they are 1) dealing with circular dependencies, and 2) building multiple artifacts from a single source tree. It's pretty flexible about everything else, and the more you conform to its conventions, the easier it gets. -- Wendy
