> Hmm..good point. If myfaces-commons is deployed at the container level, > but a new version of tomahawk wants a later myfaces-commons that's a > problem. It's very bad style to require a container's libs to be > upgraded in order to deploy a webapp, even if the new myfaces-commons > jarfile is supposed to be binary-compatible with the old one.
Yes but its the best solution we've come up with so far. John had some ideas in a thread several weeks ago. I'm going to go back an re-read them to see if I can't understand his proposal better. We need to get an update release out within the next few weeks and we're not likely to reach a better solution by then. My 2 cents, > Cheers, > > Simon > > Sean
