M Litherland schrieb:
Nice work, Werner. I guess this makes the tags I was working on for the Dojo Editor kind of useless. I will warn you that the Editor widget has some flaws with rendering which are particularly evident on a page with TabbedPanes. On Firefox you cannot edit the document and on IE the button bar doesn't show up, though the controls work. For this reason I've switched to TinyMCE in my own projects (though I was still working on Dojo for the Tomahawk tags). The Dojo folks are aware of the issues with the Editor widget, but I'm not sure their timeline for addressing it. I will say that even with these limitations the Dojo editor beats the Kupu implementation, and personally I think the documentation should be updated to encourage folks to use this trick instead of the inputHtml tag.

Yes, the editor is awesome, as for the bugs, one of the reasons why I am doing this is that we do not have to take care about the javascript bugfixing ourselves anymore (which is a huge pain given the state of javascript on cross browser implementations itself).

As for TinyMCE I would love to integrate it but the license prohibits it.

Anyway feel free to use the Dojo stuff, the base only will change slightly anymore (some minor adjustments and enhancements, and fixes, I probably did some stuff wrong given my non experience with it) the next step then will be the integration of it in actual jsf components, not over the styleClass way.


Thanks for the warning though ;-)

Another word of warning for the Dojo code - their tab implementation has issues when nesting multiple tab panels. That being said, it is spiffy looking and works well with simple pages.

Well there for sure are many issues in that lib, but overall it beats anything else out there so far, and has lots of momentum (the huge developer base is one of the most important criterion for me, also that there seems to be industry support gathering behind it, and the last aspect was that it tries to be non intrusive and very extensive).

Reply via email to