> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:08 PM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Fwd: status of the optional validator stuff [Was:
> Bookmarking, History and JSF]
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Feb 8, 2006 11:07 PM
> Subject: Re: status of the optional validator stuff [Was: Bookmarking,
> History and JSF]
> To: Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> You're sure there are any API changes?
>
> If there aren't, we might get through...
>
> Why do we need special tree-building for this? That's in fact just
> like creating child-components, right?
What he might be hinting at is:
JSF 1.1 as it works: Somehow the validators are not allowed to have
child components. It would be easier to be
able to just add <f:param... /> in lots of
cases.
Plus. As Mike points out: it is almost
impossible to recreate the component tree
correctly with the validators. Although
I still have hope to find the hole... Maybe
if I fork the sources and separate it from
the facelets-version, who knows...
Fact is: we need the OptionaValidators urgently... the number of
emails and forum-entries just show it. It is definitely
a fault of the JSF 1.1 spec.
Fact is also: It's a major PITA to get it down...
Question is now: Do we have enough need to get it working for JSF 1.1
or should we just concentrate of JSF 1.2? Can we ask
of everybody to go for facelets?...
regards
Alexander
PS: Maybe I should nag Ed about it... but he most probably just says:
"Go for 1.2"...
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 2/8/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know, but I suspect it'd break the TCK. 1.2 corrected the
> > 1.1 design flaw, so I'm guessing it's required in 1.1.
> >
> > On 2/8/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Does it require API changes or would it break the TCK if
> we would go
> > > "1.2" compatible here?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 2/8/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 1/31/06, Martin Marinschek
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > By the way - any update on the optional validator
> stuff together with
> > > > > partial validation? Ok, maybe we should start a
> different thread on
> > > > > this ;)
> > > >
> > > > I finally got around to updating the wiki page.
> > > >
> > > > The short answer is that it works fine as long as
> you're also using
> > > > facelets. It should also work if you're using JSF
> 1.2. It can't
> > > > work with standard JSF 1.1 component tree building rules.
> > > >
> > > > =================================================
> > > > Known issues
> > > >
> > > > * JSF 1.1 recreates validators and converters each
> request. This
> > > > makes it difficult (maybe impossible) to implement a
> validator element
> > > > that wraps other validator elements. Thus, you must
> also use facelets
> > > > with JSF 1.1 in order to use the optional validation framework.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
