+1 again ;) regards,
Martin On 2/10/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 ok for me > > On 2/10/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So you are ok with what is the commons branch at this moment? > > > > Sean > > > > On 2/10/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There should be no problem, but I have only tested with myfaces only > > > (not with the ri+tomahawk, shale and other stuff). The > > > extensionsFilter should be stable now. > > > > > > Bruno > > > > > > 2006/2/9, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I'd like to ask Bruno about the changes he made today to the sources - > > > > is that in - out will that cause problems? > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > On 2/9/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I also think core makes the most sense. > > > > > > > > > > +1 for core > > > > > > > > > > On 2/9/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm thinking we should release core first. This will allow all of > > > > > > the > > > > > > users (and other ASF projects like Shale) that use MyFaces to take > > > > > > advantage of the new M2 stuff we are publishing. > > > > > > > > > > > > Either way we will create a branch - actually maven will create it > > > > > > ;-) > > > > > > Then we can have a more deliberate discussion before releasing. We > > > > > > can figure out which bugs to fix before rolling out, etc. Also for > > > > > > core we will need to subject the release to the TCK. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
