I don't know enough about our Mock objects or Shale to say whether this is a good idea but I suspect it is a good idea.
Now that commons is released you can add new mock stuff there. Just don't add the tests to impl for a day or two until we create the branch. Make sense? I'd like to know more about your proposal for using Shale. It sounds like it would be a good idea but I don't personally have the time to investigate it. @Craig: Is Shale officially alpha yet? @Wendy: There are snapshots being posted now right? Sean On 2/11/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a couple unit tests for org.apache.myfaces.config w/ a dependency on > some of the stuff in org.apache.myfaces.mock.api . This causes a build error. > > I take it tests in impl cannot have build deps on stuff from the tests in api > ? Will moving the mock classes to commons solve this ? And if so, will this > interfere/complicate the current staged release activities . > > If I can get enough votes to replace all of our Mock objects with Shale, I > will do the grunt work. > > Dennis Byrne > > >
