he he. he was faster than I ;) I planed to blog the *sandbox demo* (screens and code) I modified it on my own to have a backing bean behind the formular. Really works nice!
On 2/12/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 on blogging on myfaces and dojo ;) > > regards, > > Martin > > On 2/11/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Btw. just to add something to this discussion, Alex Russel the core > > maintainer of Dojo asked me for permission to blog that we now use Dojo > > in Myfaces. > > If no one objects I would like to give him the permission > > so that he can spread the news a little bit ;-) > > As it is very likely that we wont pull the plug on Dojo. > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > Bruno Aranda schrieb: > > > Ok, sounds sensible. Let's wait for the next release then, so we have > > > the time to test all this thoroughtly, > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Bruno > > > > > > On 2/11/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hi Bruno, as we talked things over already over gtalk. > > >> > > >> I think we should wait a few more weeks, and should > > >> make a push for MyFaces 1.1.3. > > >> > > >> The reason, there is a foundation there, but we do not have any real > > >> components yet (which I would love to showcase) > > >> > > >> (except for the one development component > > >> which can trigger the dojo system) > > >> > > >> If the others have no objection I would rather have those interfaces > > >> stabilized while we work on 1-2 actual components > > >> (Bruno does currently, so do I and also Laurie Harper who contacted me a > > >> while ago) so that we see if this foundation > > >> can hold in actual usage. > > >> > > >> As for the interfaces please use them and do not try to trigger Dojo > > >> directly. The main reason for this is, that some big companies as it > > >> seems move towards dojo as well, so we might have do do an adjustment of > > >> how to initialize all that stuff in future releases (maybe weblets or > > >> something else) to avoide double imports currently I only root into our > > >> own resource loader and let dojo handle the rest. > > >> > > >> If you need an extension please extend those interfaces and do not hack > > >> your own stuff. > > >> > > >> So -1 for pushing it into tomahawk yet, simply due to the fact that I > > >> want to have everything seen in a real useage and want to know if I have > > >> to do some adjustments on the foundation I laid. > > >> But feel free to hack away in the sandbox, and we will opt a move > > >> towards tomahawk for 1.1.3. > > >> > > >> Werner > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Bruno Aranda schrieb: > > >>> Hi devs, > > >>> > > >>> I want to promote the dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk as I need > > >>> this on a project I am working on. Do we have to vote on this? As it > > >>> is not a component strictly speaking... BTW, Werner, do you think that > > >>> the dojo code is stable enough to move it to tomahawk? > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> > > >>> Bruno > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- Matthias Wessendorf Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 50674 Köln http://www.wessendorf.net mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
