Yes, I think it's reasonable to make a case to separate all of the non rendering-kit stuff into a separate jar, so long as we have enough components to make it worthwhile. After all, it was good enough for the JSF Expert Group -- it's probably good enough for us :)
On 2/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tobago has no saveState, and did not require it, but i like the ability > > to use it (and other tomahawk goodies) in applications. But none of the > > rendering components could used in tobago. I think adding the full > > tomahawk.jar to a application will mislead to use also non compatible > > components from the lib. > > This issue seems to be similar to stuff like <f:xxx>, which is also > independent from *any* RenderKit. use it with (standard) html or with > custom RenderKits (WML, XUL, Tobago,...) > > -Matthias >
