A matter of taste I think. I personally like the public modifier for interface methods. Although it is redundant information it makes reading classes (and interfaces which are classes as well) easier. When I have a quick glance on the methods of a variable's class (i.e. by jumping to the method source code in my IDE) it is often more important for me if a certain method is public or not. More important than if the object's class is a Class or an Interface. My 2 cents.
Manfred On 2/15/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/15/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > there is no need to say "public" inside of interface > > > > each method defined is public and abstract > > > > same for constants. > > > > "public static final" is not needed > > all constants are > > > > public static final String x = "x"; > > same as > > String x = "x"; > > Thanks. I suspected it might be something like that, but I'd never > seen it done that way before, and wanted to make sure. >
