Yup. We also use the optional { } around if else statements in this
project for similar reasons.
Sean
On 2/15/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 12:31 -0500, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > On 2/15/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > there is no need to say "public" inside of interface
> > >
> > > each method defined is public and abstract
> > >
> > > same for constants.
> > >
> > > "public static final" is not needed
> > > all constants are
> > >
> > > public static final String x = "x";
> > > same as
> > > String x = "x";
> >
> > Thanks. I suspected it might be something like that, but I'd never
> > seen it done that way before, and wanted to make sure.
>
> That's why I typically use "public" and "static" keywords in interfaces
> anyway; not everyone is aware of these interface features. It doesn't
> make the bytecode any larger, and cannot be misunderstood...
>
>
>
