-1 for compile dependency to core in tomahawk How would we check if someone accidentally made a mistake and accessed impl in tomahawk?
regards, Martin On 2/15/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, now I understand. > > -1 for having compile dependency to core (api, impl) in tomahawk > +1 for "provided" scope > > Manfred > > > On 2/15/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. Bernd wants the myfaces core dependencies to be included in his > > tomahawk projects automatically when he declares a tomahawk > > dependency. > > > > FWIW we will probably all want this in our personal projects since we > > use the MyFaces implementation. But for other users this is not the > > case. So I say make the user specify the core dependencies explicity. > > > > Sean > > > > On 2/15/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What about the <optional> attribute in the dependency. Would that > > > solve the problem? > > > > > > Manfred > > > > > > > > > On 2/15/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Why has myfaces-impl and myfaces-api the scope provided? > > > > > > > > > > Is the myfaces-impl and myfaces-api installed on the container? > > > > > > > > > > The normal user would expect a compile dependency to the myfaces-libs. > > > > > If I like to use the RI instead, I have to exclude the dependency in > > > > > my > > > > > project and add a dependency to the RI. > > > > > > > > Hmmm. I wasn't aware that was an option. > > > > > > > > > Now I have to declare a dependency to myfaces or the RI im my tomahawk > > > > > or sandbox project everytime. > > > > > > > > Many of our tomahawk users use the RI so I don't see the big deal. > > > > > > > > > Can we switch back to the compile dependency, please. > > > > > > > > Lets see what the others think before we decide. Now that I know > > > > there is an option to exclude the dependency I am more open to your > > > > request. I still think its weird to automatically include the myfaces > > > > core when you declare the tomahawk dependency. > > > > > > > > The user has the option and 50% of our users will probably be using > > > > another implementation. So it seems more appropriate to have a > > > > provided scope. > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > Bernd > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Dipl.-Ing. Bernd Bohmann - Atanion GmbH - Software Development > > > > > Bismarckstr. 13, 26122 Oldenburg, http://www.atanion.com > > > > > phone: +49 441 4082312, mobile: +49 173 8839471, fax: +49 441 4082333 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
