Sorry meant to say we want those depend on the core. There's no harm there (I think.)
Sean On 2/16/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wait a sec. The examples are different. We *want* those to depend on > tomahawk and we want the dependencies to be included in the WAR. > > Sean > > On 2/16/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, there are still some quirks to be fixed. > > e.g. tomahawk examples must not have compile dependency to impl etc. > > I have already fixed most of this, but I want to make sure that > > everything builds fine and the wars contain every lib that's needed > > before I commit. > > > > Manfred > > > > > > On 2/16/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think the dependencies are already the way we want them. > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > On 2/16/06, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok, I will now fix all the tomahawk dependencies and do some tests. > > > > Stay tuned. > > > > > > > > Manfred > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/15/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >How would we check if someone accidentally made a mistake and > > > > > >accessed > > > > > >impl in tomahawk? > > > > > > > > > > This has happened at least once but it was fixed, so +1 . > > > > > > > > > > Dennis Byrne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
