With the problem that it is just not possible, as long as we have commons...
regards, Martin On 2/17/06, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 to the reorganization. > > I too feel this is the only way to release the 'Core' separate from any > components, and that separate releases are vital to all of the MyFaces > projects. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 3:43 AM > > To: MyFaces Development > > Subject: New MyFaces JIRA structure > > > > Hi all, > > Sean already posted some thoughts recently. I know we should bring out > > our next release first, but meanwhile we could have some thoughts > > about future JIRA structure and version management. > > > > Here is a short roundup of what we have: > > > > MyFaces (sub-)projects on the site: > > API > > Impl > > Commons > > Tomahawk > > Sandbox > > (Tobago) > > > > We will release the following assemblies with different release > numbers: > > Core (= API + Impl) > > Commons > > Tomahawk (with or without Sandbox?) > > (Tobago) > > > > I propose the following Jira-Projects: > > MYFACES > > MYFACES-COMMONS > > MYFACES-TOMAHAWK > > MYFACES-TOBAGO > > > > All four would have the common Jira category "MyFaces". So they will > > still be tied together. > > > > There were some discussions regarding Commons in Jira. IMHO this is > > the only solution, that is logical and does not lead to additional > > confusion. Commons will have it's own release cycles - there is no > > other way to solve this without having unwanted peculiarities. Some > > alternatives, that where discussed recently: > > * A custom field "Affected Commons Version": What about the "Fix > > Version"? Where do I document it. Another custom field "Commons Fix > > Version"? No, no, please. > > * Request a JIRA enhancement? Not possible within a realistic time > frame IMHO. > > > > So, what is the real drawback? The only one I can think of (and was > > noted in former discussions) is, that people will report Commons bugs > > in MYFACES. Well, moving issues between Jira projects is no big deal > > as already was said. And: The very same applies to Tomahawk issues. > > Many many Tomahawk bugs will be reported in MYFACES, because there > > will always be cases where it is not so clear which sub-projects is > > causing the actual problem. > > So, it's always the developer's job to finally put the issue into the > > right category, project, component, or whatever. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Manfred > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
