Some of the state manager code coming in from ADF Faces will help in this area; it's not a magic bullet, but it can help significantly.
-- Adam Winer On 2/17/06, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From my tests comparing client and server state, I must say client-state > will not even scale to medium traffic... > > The performance hit with client state was horrendous. processing time > was up to 5 times higher than with server-state. And the memory > footprint > was not significantly lower. > > We should be able to answer questions in that area as soon as we have > a demo-application that we can load-test... > > regards > Alexander > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Werner Punz > > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:09 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Was someone looking for a public high traffic site? > > > > Martin Marinschek schrieb: > > > Do you have one, Travis? > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > Question is, can myfaces really scale to high traffic (it definitely > > from low to medium traffic) > > > > the reason for my question is, as Hookoom has pointed out, > > that you cannot use client side state saving on such sites due to the > > fact that many people accessing those do not have broadband, > > and server > > side state saving adds a lot of burden to the session due to exsessive > > state saving even in components which basically do not need it. > > > > Well not really a question, you can solve all those things with more > > cluster servers, but the question is more how much more overhead would > > it be in JSF than compared to stateless frameworks, I guess. > > > > >
