Ok,
I digged a little deeper - Grant, are you talking about disabled or
readonly selectOneMenu's?
I found a bug in RendererUtils, where readonly was checked for with
readOnly instead of readonly ;)
regards,
Martin
On 2/19/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, this is the corresponding code. Wonder why that doesn't work. Very
> strange.
>
> public static void decodeUISelectOne(FacesContext facesContext,
> UIComponent component) {
> if (!(component instanceof EditableValueHolder)) {
> throw new IllegalArgumentException("Component "
> + component.getClientId(facesContext)
> + " is not an EditableValueHolder");
> }
>
> if(isDisabledOrReadOnly(component))
> return;
>
> Map paramMap = facesContext.getExternalContext()
> .getRequestParameterMap();
> String clientId = component.getClientId(facesContext);
> if (paramMap.containsKey(clientId)) {
> //request parameter found, set submitted value
> ((EditableValueHolder) component).setSubmittedValue(paramMap
> .get(clientId));
> } else {
> //see reason for this action at decodeUISelectMany
> ((EditableValueHolder) component).setSubmittedValue(
> RendererUtils.NOTHING );
> }
> }
>
> maybe there is an error later on?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 2/18/06, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I haven't delved into the code yet, but the behaviour is definitely
> > exhibiting itself in an application Im working on. Perhaps someone can do an
> > independent analysis to confirm. I have some really ugly workarounds in my
> > backing bean now that try to dodge the null that I'm really keen to get rid
> > of.
> >
> >
> > On 2/18/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm ok with fixing it. If it breaks the TCK then we could ask Sun to
> > > patch the TCK. I believe they did this for us during the initial TCK
> > > testing.
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > On 2/18/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Why is that?
> > > >
> > > > I thought that we checked if disabled or readonly was set to true, and
> > > > then stop decoding?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 2/18/06, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Wow. So it turns out that Myfaces suffers from a particularly nasty
> > bug
> > > > > which was also present in the Sun 1.1 RI.
> > > > >
> > https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87
> > > > >
> > > > > So anyone who is disabling a dropdown, beware of this! Your backing
> > bean
> > > > > will become null for that property on submit.
> > > > > Now, the question is will fixing this have any effect on the TCK
> > results ?
> > > > > I'm in favor of fixing it, and will do it if I get some consensus.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Grant Smith
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces