Hi Simon!
>
> I'm not sure about your proposal to add script links inline. IF there is
> no other reason for the extensions filter to buffer output then I'm in
> favour, ie if you can get your funky CSS-linking proposal to work.
>
:-) For sure, all this requires the CSS thing gets up and running.
> However if the extensions filter *has* to buffer in order to output CSS
> links, then I'm in favour of emitting script links into the head also.
> It's tidier.
>
+1 If we still have the buffer, I wont change anything of the current
behaviour.
> One thing I would like to see changed is the functionality that inserts
> script into the body tag's onload attribute. This can more cleanly be
> done via inline script emitted into the document body that goes
> something like this:
> <script>
> var oldOnload =document.onload;
> document.onload=function() {
> oldOnload();
> // new code goes here
> }
> </script>
>
Yes, I forgot to mention this. Its already on the todo list :-)
Ciao,
Mario
