Right, I meant the currently-uncreated commons, not shared. I don't see a point in putting it in shared -- we're not allowed to change the behavior of the standard validators, and the existing validators work per spec.
I was pretty sure you just meant to add it to tomahawk, but I wanted to make sure you weren't pushing for commons already :) On 3/6/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well there is no commons package yet and I definitely think we should > hold off on that decision for a little while. (I assume you mean the > new commons and not the current shared.) > > So if you were to create it in tomahawk that would be ok. If its > useful for impl then it could go in shared. > > Sean > > On 3/6/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/6/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The timing would be best to do > > > this right now or to wait a few weeks after we create a tomahawk > > > branch. > > > > The timing for creating the ValidatorBase class, or the timing for > > putting it into a Commons package? > > >
