What is lost if we just start over? Seriously. Dennis Byrne
>-----Original Message----- >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, March 6, 2006 03:01 PM >To: 'MyFaces Development' >Subject: Re: Testing Progress? > >Ok so should we create a new myfaces core branch then (off the current >trunk.) That seems like the best option given the choices ... > >Sean > >On 3/6/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi! >> > Is the ExtensionFilter bug something that already exists in the >> > current 1.1.1 release? >> IMHO no. >> This bug were introduced during the creation of AddResourceFactory which >> was 2006-02-08. So after the 1.1.1 release. >> >> > If its not a new bug then I don't mind >> > releasing with the bug in place. Also, if the bug only affects >> > tomahawk then it doesn't matter at this point. >> This bug affects the whole system as soon as you start using the filter >> which is a requirement for myfaces. >> Its a REALLY nasty bug as the filter will deliver the response not to >> the requestee. Its possible to get the output of another user instead of >> the one you requested. >> >> > (Sorry for not taking >> > the time to read my old email but I am trying to help you guys out >> > with the release before I leave the country.) >> > >> :-) Thank you! >> >> >> BTW: How do you plan to tag shared? We need separate tags for >> >> shared_tomahawk and shared_imp, no? >> >> >> > >> > No, those are artifacts of maven. There is only one copy of the >> > shared source code and it will be branched and tagged according to the >> > version (2.0.0) >> > >> So if you release tomahawk at any time later you have to increase the >> version? >> But even then, the shared_impl-2.0.1 might not be compatible to >> shared_impl-2.0.0 if you tagged shared to release tomahawk. >> >> --- >> Mario >> >> >
