So does anyone have any objections to my new branch creation? There is certainly no harm (we can always abandon the branch again) but I'd rather not go through with the work if we aren't committed to releasing ASAP.
Sean On 3/29/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/29/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No I don't think this has to be resolved right now. It will just mean > > some stuff will be in the core that won't be there the next time > > around. Especially if the dependencies are sandbox only I don't see > > the need to slow things down. Do you? > > No, that's also my thought on the matter. I think now that we've > separated shared_impl and shared_tomahawk, moving things around won't > affect impl. I wanted a second opinion in case I was overlooking > something. > > I see the issue as a blocker for Tomahawk (or at least sandbox), but > not applicable for Impl. >
