That sounds reasonalbe. some small example to get an idea, what the component does is a good (minimum) requirement.
-Matthias On 3/31/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suppose that an example would make a good minimum requirement for the > sandbox. > > regards, > > Martin > > On 3/31/06, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On the other hand: How are users thought to use and test a new > > sandbox-component if not at least a minimal amount of informations is > > available. > > Either javadoc (describing how to use) or a minimal (incomplete) xdoc > > documentation might make since also for sandbox stuff... > > > > just my 2cents > > Alexander > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 10:53 PM > > > To: MyFaces Development > > > Subject: Re: Committing new contributed components [was: Re: > > > [jira] Closed: (TOMAHAWK-165) ifMessage tag that renders > > > children only if there is a message for the specified component(s)] > > > > > > I'm explicitly -1 on putting this restriction on new > > > components in the sandbox. > > > > > > The sandbox is a playground, and this is what it is supposed to be. > > > > > > I am +1 on only allowing a component to get to tomahawk if all those > > > requirements are met. > > > > > > And by the way, we should really start to vote on the > > > schedule component.... > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 3/30/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > And Javadoc as well on the component. Examples, > > > > Javadoc, tag documentation, etc. (And, if there > > > > were a solid testing framework in place, unit tests > > > > as well!) > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/30/06, Jurgen Lust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > A component is useless if people don't know how to use it. > > > > > > > > > > Jurgen > > > > > > > > > > Mike Kienenberger schreef: > > > > > On 3/30/06, Bruno Aranda (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks Mike! This component could be useful to many > > > people. I have > > > > > committed it into the sandbox. Could you prepare a > > > documentation patch for > > > > > the web site? > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to propose that we don't accept (ie, commit) any new > > > > > components until such components have both an example and xdocs > > > > > documentation as part of the patch. > > > > > > > > > > This should also be true of anything we ourselves put > > > into the sandbox. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- Matthias Wessendorf Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 50674 Köln http://www.wessendorf.net mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
