I believe we should be uniform here. Sure, it's not an issue of
world-wide importance, but we've discussed less important things more
pedantic on this list ;).

regards,

Martin

On 4/3/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > Personally, I can't see this issue being a useful place to become
> > pedantic :-).
> Sure, you are right, but on the other hand this can easily be solved and
> so I'll propose to change it.
> It looks more professional if we have a clean way - the configuration is
> one of the first things a user has to play with.
> And we need a standard, e.g. we dont want to let one discard the
> "org.apache.myfaces." prefix - so why not also define how to write the rest.
>
> > There are much more important usability issues that deserve attention.
> A short excerpt of what you have in mind would be nice.
>
>
> ---
> Mario
>
>


--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to