Don't get you. You mean the treewalk was suggested, but turned down? I definitely want to have invokeOnComponent, just would want to do a treewalk, too, if necessary.
It's all about adding custom lifecycle phases, which will work with any component, but don't need a change in the component itself. regards, Martin On 4/4/06, Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This was brought up, but we were looking for a way to selectively > process known components (even to themselves) from the client. Kind of > riding the point that we can't externally provide a strategy to walk the > component tree, but needed something efficient without introducing a > full tree walk by the components themselves. > > I'm all for more cool features for JSF 1.2-- > > > > Martin Marinschek wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > I don't want to sound impudent - but can I ask for an extension for > > the invokeOnComponent? > > > > Invoke on component is great for one, two, four components, but there > > are times when I want to walk the whole tree, executing something on > > certain components, changing properties, etc. Very useful together > > with phase-listeners. > > > > Is there a way to add something like > > > > walkTree > > > > or > > > > invokeComponent > > > > without a client-id parameter? > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > -- > -------------------------- > Sent from my FrankenBerry Wireless Handheld > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
