>> Its more "what do the http spec say" about URI size limits - and how >> long might it take to have browsers with higher limits spread out. >> > > rfc 2616 only *warns* about the 255 limit, and places no limit on the > protocol itself, leaving this up to the server or any intermediary. I don't > think there are many faces requests below this threshhold. > However, fact is that the browser cuts the url. No way for a server, proxy or anything else to do something better. Even the ~2K limit (which is what we have today for GET requests) is way too small to handle a JSF request with all its view/tree state.
Notice, the above is not true for the body data of a POST request. Ciao, Mario
