Manfred
On 4/13/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
This issue still isn't fixed. Please review my latest JIRA comments
on the proposed solution. This issue is our top priority right now.
Sean
On 4/12/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, it appears i did not commit the test last night or the fix today.
> I just committed both to the branch.
>
> Sean
>
> On 4/12/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok so this is how things work outside of unit tests. I am committing
> > a fix that I think should work for the unit test (and TCK) and still
> > leave the existing functionality the way it is (which is presumably
> > good b/c we've heard no complaints on this.)
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 4/12/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > MyFaces looks for a parameter called jsf_sequence . Do a few post backs on any form page in the example app and you'll see this incremented. This is how the impl keeps track of which view to associate w/ each
> > >
> > > IF YOU KNOW ANYTHING MORE ON THIS, HELP.
> > >
> > > Dennis Byrne
> > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:58 AM
> > > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
> > > >Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] Major blocker issue: MYFACES-1281
> > > >
> > > >Still waiting for some help on this issue. Come on MyFaces committers
> > > >lets get this one figured out. You don't need the TCK to fix this.
> > > >Just make the unit test work and help explain how it works (if it ever
> > > >worked) in the standard non-unit test case.
> > > >
> > > >Sean
> > > >
> > > >On 4/11/06, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> There is an outstanding issue that is preventing us from passing the
> > > >> TCK. Without this we cannot release a JSF 1.1 certified release. We
> > > >> could use everyone's help in tracking this down and resolving ASAP.
> > > >> We need to get on with the 1.1.2 release.
> > > >>
> > > >> Sean
> > > >>
> > > >> ps. More frequent releases should help reduce the number of suprise
> > > >> TCK failures per release. Also more unit tests will be helpful here.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
