Facelets are faster - the JSP overhead goes with them. Adam quoted 14% speed gains by using Facelets.
regards, Martin On 4/18/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Werner! > > Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) schrieb: > > > >> Do you mean replicating the tomahawk-components or different > >> components under the tomahawk-sign? > >> > > Different components, I have had this idea for some time now. > > > Sorry, I dont like this idea. > > I dont know, why you think facelets are speedier. They use exactly the > same renderer class, no? > > The only thing you win is not to have to write the tag class and a tld. > Its not worth to risk to have new components only work with facelets. > > Wasnt one of the ideas of JSF to allow a migration from JSP to JSF? We > shouldnt break it. > > But I admit having to write the html markup in an renderer is a pain. > What about a html2jsf converter which takes a html input file and > generates the out.write stuff? > Should be possible. > > Ciao, > Mario > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
