I like Sean's plan.  Martin, can you help me understand your objections
concerning Tomcat 6?  I don't understand why having Tomcat 6 in a
released version makes a difference.

Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://stansilvert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:26 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: JSF 1.2: branch, wiki, maven repo, ...
> 
> Number #2 is no-no for me, as long as we don't have Tomcat 6 in a
> decent, usable release out.
> 
> regards,
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 4/24/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since there seems to be enough interest to go forward on this, I
have
> > two suggestions for you.
> >
> > 1.) Wait until the next core 1.1.3 release (end of this week.)
> >
> > 2.) Make the JSF 1.1 stuff the branch and put the JSF 1.2 stuff on
the
> > *trunk.*
> >
> > The thinking on number two is that there shouldn't be a lot of
changes
> > to the core other then minor bug fixes.  So when we do have to merge
> > it will be easier to merge the smaller set of changes.
> >
> > We can change the externals in "current" to point to the branch.
> >
> > If we follow my suggestion on #2 I suggest posting a new thread
> > followed where this is clearly stated.  Some people might have
strong
> > feelings on the issue and we want to make sure their voices are
heard.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> 
> 
> --
> 
> http://www.irian.at
> 
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
> 
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to